Business Law Essay

Legal System and TortsIssueIs Universals run and grille answerable for the throw caused by its employee , AmyRuleThe Universals Bar and grill solve is not liable to Jennifer at all . further the employer buns choose to pay for the expenses incurred by Jennifer and make Amy pay the sum when she already had resources or silver gray . Such arrangement can be through with(p) individually between Amy and The Universals Bar and lattice only and cannot be trim down by the Court as there is no cuneus judice basis to do such p AnalysisIn legal work , there is a principle that dictates the obligation of the employer to his employee . This is referred as Respondeat superior which implies that superiors or employers are responsible for the actions done by their employees , agents , or subordinates during their assigned duties (Legal Explanations .com , 2008 . In other words , the employers can be legally held responsible for the actions of their employees . However , there is an riddance to this hold back . The employer is liable or responsible only when the employee s negligence happened in the workplace and in relation to or magic plot of ground carrying egress the tasked assigned to him or her . When the action causing indebtedness on the employee was done independent from the assigned task or because of personalised reason , the employer cannot be held responsible . In this character reference Jennifer unintentionally broke her nose and spent 9 ,000 for her surgical operation as an effect of Amy s flinging of plate which was targeted to John . The accident happened part Amy was on duty . However , Amy s action was not affiliated with her hypothesize as a waitress but earlier it was out(p) of see red she had on her boyfriend , John . The contingency of Amy is an caseful of the excep tion to the rule of Respondeat Superior . Th! us , Universals Bar and Grill cannot be responsible for Amy s act as it was done outdoor(a) Amy s responsibility as waitress .

The action of Amy is attributable to her crossness on her boyfriend , John . Such is not a responsible or a related act to be a waitress . Hence , the employer has no legal obligation at all to Amy . In fact , Universals Bar and Grill can even fine Amy for the broken plates and other things that whitethorn have been broken because of her act . The employer can in amplification discern disciplinary action against AmyConclusionIn business , the law makes the employers responsible for th eir employees . This is base on the principle of Respondeat Superior . In step-up , it is found on fairness as the employer is profiting at the expense of the employees . It is also unavoidable that employees can encounter accidents or unsuitable events while carrying out their tasks or duties . In not to harm the employees , the employer can be legally held responsible for the act of their employees . However , an exception to the rule is that the employer cannot be held liable for actions made by employees not related to their duties or responsibilities . If the employee...If you want to get a to the full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper