'Alan Lightman’s “Progress” Essay\r'

'In Alan Light hu firearm beings’s shape up; the writer believes that the gen datel estimation astir(predicate) advancement in engineering cosmos the metre scale for society’s progress is a logical delusion; the two ideas mentioned in this dissever body politic Lightman’s self contradictory, yet sexual congress and valid points. In the fourth paragraph Lightman states, â€Å"If progress is human triumph, has anyone shown that Twentieth- century flock are happier than Nineteenth-century hoi polloi?” Alan Lightman bring come ons it clear that scientific advancements are non a authoritative indicator of society’s progress. He hints that a better indicator would be â€Å"human happiness”. I pit with the writer because happiness to me is the real measuring scale of progress.\r\nTechnology has been evolving ever since man invented the wheel. In any given era or time in memorial the technology or know-how has always been of the highest aim; it is only later on in history that makes technology of the past depend old or â€Å" start-dated”. Twenty-five days from now today’s technology will seem obsolete, even though at this present time it is the finest man can manage. Lightman’s second idea comes close to contradicting himself, but it still makes a valid point. The writer states, â€Å"Only a fool would claim that new technology rarely improves the tone of life”. Lightman challenges his primarily statement by indicating that technology improves the quality of life. This is a â€Å"slight” contradiction because if technology â€Å"improves the quality of life”, it aids in human happiness.\r\nIt indicates that humans are glad when the quality of life is high. Indirectly, the writer points out that advancement in technology helps make people happy. I disagree with this receivable to the fact that a high-quality lifestyle is not the sole reason why people are happ y. People find happiness in non-covetous things such as religion, family, reading, temper etcetera. Lightman’s contradictory ideas lay out a perfect platform for an obscured kernel of progress. In conclusion, there is no particularised dimension (indicator) for progress, as the two issues mentioned indicate. put across can not be specifically defined. The ideas also show the confusion in which the writer is himself in. As Einstein himself said, â€Å"It has generate appallingly obvious that our technology has exceeded our humanity.”\r\n'