Augustine Aquinas

doubting Thomas embraces the sensible, arguing that the cloth world is essential in line of battle to understand the divine. Though the theories of twain manpower be different, they both agreed that one could know deity through reason, yet no one could understand god fully because deity created man. SST. Augustine and SST. doubting Thomas on Human Nature SST. Augustine believed that human being constitution, which was created by idol, was high-priced. He in uniform manner believed that piece are equ all toldy able to choose honourable or bad, but humans are constantly attracted to evil because of our mischievous temperament that we inherited from Adam (Free will, 2013).SST. Augustine argued that the only counsel to escape this sinful nature was to take aim the grace checkn by God, which we gather only by salvation and being dangerous. SST. Aquinas theory on nature differs from SST. Augustine. He believed that human nature is the compilation of the mind, bo dy, and soul. Our minds and bodies are subject to corruption, but our souls are pert and free from corruption. To exist, according to Aquinas, is to be dear(p). However, our human nature or our soundly depends on pricyness of our actions. SST. Augustine and SST.Aquinas Knowing correct SST. Augustine believed that we are trapped by our sins and our fulfillment or triumph bunghole only be found in God (Clark &038 opportune, 2003). For Augustine, wise to(p) the good was not enough to touch off humans to be good. Humans due to their free will and sinful nature require divine intervention discerning God. SST. Augustine believed that good was not found in worldly possessions and that we should not attach ourselves to much(prenominal) things (2003). Material possessions can be scattered and God is the only good that cannot be lost. SST.Aquinas was a follower of Aristotle, who also believed that good was pendent on whether it contributed or deterred us from our square-toed hum an end, which is dominance, or happiness. He also believed the slew could know good by reasoning well (Lecture 3, SYS-305, GU, 2013). Knowing good involve a range of skilful and moral virtues that enable us to quail at the nature of true happiness, and motivate us to essay for it on a consonant basis. He also believed that good, was conking a maximally fulfilling life and that we as humans are always in search of fulfillment (Wilkins, 201 1).SST. Augustine &038 SST. Aquinas on DOing Good Both SST. Augustine and SST. Aquinas felt that doing good required God to be the main(prenominal) focus of man. For SST. Augustine, doing good required our mania of God to be primary (Augustine, 2014). If we give God our primary love, then all other loves gain value. If we love God first, we will know what is right and good (Aquinas &038 Regis, 1997). Putting God first, put good in the proper order, which would then tercet us to diamond. SST. Aquinas felt that our happiness or goodness is n ot be found in created things. SST.Aquinas believed that doing DOD required God and that God alone was adapted for our fulfillment, or happiness. True fulfillment in doing good would come from loving God and our neighbor (Clark &038 Progeny, 2003). Hope of our fulfillment, or of doing good, can only be found in receiving grace and leading us to a closer relationship and love of God (Aquinas &038 Pegs, 1997). Critique of SST. Augustine and SST. Aquinas Though SST. Augustine and SST. Aquinas have different views about material possessions in the world, SST. Aquinas has the view that is more rational.His view is not as pugnacious as SST Augustine. SST. Augustine is strict on the intuitive feeling that we are all broken people due to mans sinful nature. Without saying so directly, he makes humans sound like awful beings that are no good. Whereas SST. Aquinas does believe that, we have a sinful nature, but that we all have the talent to have a fulfilling life and reach our ultimate goal of happiness in the end with God. Conclusion SST. Augustine and SST. Aquinas were both great minds of medieval times. They were pioneers in divinity and Christianity.