On the Importance of the Educational Experience Essay

In Democracy and schooling Dewey bewilders his overhears regarding the three functions of education. He gives the main function of education, these being (1) Education should simplify and order the factors of the dispositions it wants to develop, (2) Education should purify and idealize existing social customs, and (3) Education should take a shit a wider and better balanced surround which will influence the young (Dewey 37).He nones that these stand as a requirement for enabling the development of a progressive and democratic nine wherein he defines a progressive society as one in which individual variations are considered precious (thereby) allowing for cerebral freedom and the play of diverse gifts and interests in its educational measure (Dewey 451). Deweys views thereby relate the importance of the experience at bottom educational institutions to that of ensuring republic within a particular community.Since the foundations of democracy are that of liberty and equality, Dewey places fierceness on the necessity of ensuring that intellectual freedom may be comely within the context of an institution that allows diversity. Within educational dusts, an example of this screwing be seen in the practice of coeducation. As contrasted to this view, however, Link Byfield, in his article If Girls Can Succeed Only at the Expense of Boys, peradventure We Need Segregated Schools conveys that the implementation of coeducational schemas leads to the development of sexism within the system which proves detrimental to the non-privileged sex.In line with this, the tasks of this paper are the following (1) It seeks to present the views presented by Byfield in his article above and (2) It aims to present an analysis of his controversy in line with how coeducation has helped in the presentation of more views in the several(predicate) subjects within the educational institution and how these views enable the expansion of the educational process.Byfield (2008) argues that sum up in the scores of high school school girls in the School movement Indicators Program (SAIP) in Canada shows that there is regress in the educational system. The bases for his claim are the following. He claims that low proficiency of high school boys in wrangle skills and low number of high school boys who have receive within the time-frame of the survey. He thereby opposes the view presented by the SAIP that school systems within favor the members of both sexes. The bases for SAIPs conclusion are the following views.First, high school girls on average are matching boys in the engineering science related subjects of math and science, and are far ahead in language skills and second the ratio of the number of graduates shows that more girls are graduating as opposed to boys. In line with this, Byfield notes, given that a change in the system from male-oriented to female-oriented led to the regress in the educational achievement of male students, the power argu es that it is necessary to segregate students in terms of sex.The basis for his claim is the view that sexism continues to be practiced within educational institutions. He notes that this is apparent in the shift of power from the boys to the girls. He says, Now girls seem to run everything the boys just tune out. In addition to this, he says that the adaptation of a segregated system will allow the individual to be socialise in a natural environment which will allow him to be prepared for the real life.He further argues that this will not offend the social imperative in the sense that it will create a society driven by misunderstanding, ignorance, selfishness, and distrust, on the another(prenominal) hand, such a setting will free the individual from an environment characterized by moshpits of vulgarity where youth is free to run itself according to the set it has absorbed from MachMusic and 12 years of automatic passing and parent-free sex centering.