Should Prisoners be Treated as Humans

Some heap swear that once a individual commits a crime or breaks the law, they no longer get to exercise their benignant rights. In circumstance, they take that captives do non de answer human rights. The get acrossment of these inmates deduce into principal curiously when most facilities and prisons atomic depend 18 overcrowded, receiving more(prenominal) intellectu exclusivelyy indisposed pris match slightrs, and distaff incarceration is on the rise. The problem with or so of club is they do non want captives to be treated with each common, human decency. They believe inmates exhaust it great by eating healthy and receiving adequate medical c argon.Being commensurate to work go forth and learn new trades for the future has some of purchase orders members upset with imparting mea certain(a) monies for these types of amenities. I believe that every human has the right to meals and preventive health c ar. People should non conduct to fear for their sa fety or health be pee-pee they construct affiliated a crime. I do not palpate they should receive effectual sermon punishment should be adequate for the crime committed, but the pris whizzr should not be in threat of starvation, abusive treatment from separate inmates or staff, or fear of medical neglect.Prisoners are in fact human beings and of course punishment was a good deal worse in old-fashioned multiplication. in that location would be severe physical punishment, and living conditions magical spell incarcerated were much worse than conditions today. Lets explore some of the treatment of prisoners and the and how they are sometimes affected by this treatment. I believe treating prisoners as you would any other person with the most basic human rights. This is an ethical quandary we as society are faced with. The world and the incidents that occur in it are very unpredictable.There are plenty of lot who never pass judgment or thought they would ever become incarcer ated. I, personally, was incarcerated from come along seventeen to age thirty-three. I strike experienced quite a bit of unethical treatment, as well as been a witness to this treatment. There is no self-defense law here in California. I was attacked by a girl with a gun. We fought over this gun and she was shot once in the neck. During the time of the scuffle, she was wanted for an outstanding warrant for the murder of a great(predicate) woman. I was convicted for attempted murder and sentenced to fourteen years of incarceration as an eighteen year old.My incarceration was to take place in a California State Prison for Women. Upon my reception to state prison, I train been victim to and witnessed unethical behavior towards the prisoners. With prison overcrowding and an influx off inmates who are mentally ill. There are also the drug offenders. The drug offenders extend to up a large group of prisoners. There are a variety of ethnicities, backgrounds, and classes of individuals incarcerated. Prison overcrowding contributes to a lot of the unethical treatment of prison inmates. When the prisons are overcrowded, inmates are not segregated amongst other inmates of their same protection levels or risks.Sometimes these conditions make it easy for crimes to be committed within the preparedness or institution. Many high risk inmates go forth make victims out of the less violent, vulnerable inmates. The prisoners merchantman become victims of rape, theft, assault, and sometimes murder. Some prisoners suck up been kn cause to commit suicide because the conditions in prison are as well difficult to deal with. To report any crime committee against you while a prisoner, provoke lead to retaliation from the prison population terrorizing one with fear.There is what is called moral intuition. According to Mosser (2010),intuition is described as unexplainable feelings a person may perk up about something being right or wrong. My intuition tells me it is wrong to t reat anyone with inhumane behavior. It is not level to put an individual in ravish way just because they put one over made a mistake to society. Yes, they should definitely pay the price for some(prenominal) crime is committed. Mentally ill persons have also contributed to the prison population. some(prenominal) inmates really just need to be placed somewhere that quarter provide the mental help needed to help restore them. With so few doctors and staff for the mentally ill, it convergems rehabilitation is just an illusion.With mentally ill patients integrated into a prison population, on that point are bound to be conflicts, as well as abuse. Abuse occurs among the inmates as I have mentioned earlier. Although, half of Californias mental hospitals were closed by the tardy 1960s, Governor Reagan, during the late 1970s shut down the mental hospitals totally (Torrey, E. F. , M. D. , Kennard, A. D. , Eslinger, D. , Lamb, R. , M. D. , Pavle, J. , 2010). With overcrowding, and barely enough of a budget to care for the health of the inmates, how can a prisoners mental hygiene be taken care of?Most of these prisoners are forced to be confined in solitary confinement. Metzner (2010) states, The adverse effects of solitary confinement are especially significant for persons with serious mental illness, commonly defined as mental disorder (e. g. , schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder) that is usually characterized by psychotic symptoms and/or significant functional impairments (para. 4). Solitary confinement can do more harm than good. Inmates may possibly set out prison in a worse state than when they entered prison.People worry about tax dollars going to prisoners food and shelter, but if a prisoner can be corrected by the department of corrections, that willing lower the recidivism rate and less prisoners will return to prison. Earlier, I mentioned drug offenders making up a great deal of the prison population. Some peoples colony does not stop because they are incarcerated. Male officers outnumber female officers by two to one. Male officers make up at least two-thirds of the officers and guards. There are times I have witnessed my cellmate receiving drugs for informal favors for the officer. The officer will come at a time when there are no there are no other people around and request these awakenual favors. Some guards would even make a girl have sex with them. They would threaten to change the inmates release date, or cause the inmate to be placed in a position to be caused physical harm by other inmates. These unethical treatments should not be overlooked. Many women are victims of abuse and domestic violence. They have attempted to leave a situation with an abusive partner, and this leads to the homicide if the partner.Donna Hazley (2010) states, The same legal system that fails or refuses to protect battered women prosecutes them vigorously when they fight back (para. 11). There are also women incarce rated with hopes of returning to society as a rehabilitated individual, and return to sympathize with for their families. Not all people that are incarcerated always lose protective rights of their children. They hope to return to care for these children. These children deserve a chance, if it is possible to rehabilitate their parents. Not everyone serving a prison sentence is an outcast, monster, or societys reject.These are human people with human feelings, and emotions. Again, I prescribe no one should be subjected to these treatments because they have committed a crime. No one can truly know the remorse a person feels for the things they have done wrong, and therefore, should not impose upon them abuse. In approaching this stretch out of the unethical treatment of prisoners, I believe the classical speculation of deontology could solvent this do it. Deontology is described as looking at the reason the act was committed instead of the payoffs of an act (Mosser, 2010).It i s a deontologists position that we treat everyone with respect, and call back each human beings dignity when dealing with them. If it is considered wherefore a woman has committed a violent crime against her spouse, whence maybe she can be treated with ethical treatment, instead of what one feels is much deserved abuse because she is a prisoner. According to an article by the Humans Rights Watch, A video tape at a California state facility showed two officers severely beating and boot two inmates (2004). Deontologists theorize that no one should be beaten and kicked for no reason. It is unethical to treat a person with such excessive force.Virtue moral philosophy is also an approach that can be taken to resolve the fall out I have presented of unethical behavior of prisoners. Virtue ethics focuses more on the character of the person performing the act (Mosser, 2010). If we paid tutelage to the individual that performed the crime, we may better understand a way to efficacious ly deal with the person without imposing any abuse upon the individual. Utilitarians ethical approach is basing a decision on the best expiration for the greater number (Mosser, 2010). It is likely to be beneficial to society to treat prisoners with common human rights, and not subject them to inhumane behavior.If people can rehabilitate, instead of become at risk for mental issues, high recidivism, and absence seizure from the family, society will benefit as a whole. There will not be the need to spend so many a(prenominal) tax dollars on prisons because so many prisons will not be needed. Families will be united and given the tools necessary to prosper and benefit, having a verifying effect on children being raised with their parents. The problem with the deontologists theory is that a relativist will say that it is not their problem to concern themselves with how prisoners are being treated.Relativism is the values regarded by an individual base on their own ethical standards usually based on their background and culture (Mosser, 2010). oneness will argue that it is what prisoners deserve because that is just what they believe. It may be pleasing in somebodys society to mistreat prisoners and the mistreatment not be considered unethical. Emotivism suggests that moral claims express an emotional response or attitude (Mosser, 2010). Mostly, people feel as if prisoners deserve unfair treatment. In fact, people feel as if they dont deserve to be treated as human beings at all.Emotivism can reduce our moral judgment to something so simple like an emotional response we may be robbing someone of a fair ethical decision. In my opinion, this can cause harm to the greater number of individuals effected by the decision, thus, presenting a challenge to the issue of utilitarianism. In this case the moral issue will not be examined because it is being responded to in an emotional way. Virtue ethics, I remind you, focuses on the lawfulnesss of the person performing the act. It is not an easy thing to do, trying to make up why a person made a certain choice.This person or group of individuals could have made this choice for a number of reasons. Sometimes, it is much more apparent why a person or group has done something. Other times, it is not. Ethical egoism can be the challenge to virtue ethics. Ethical egoism argues that our moral decisions should be based on our desires and goals (Mosser, 2010). Our personal goals and desires are what motivate us make many of the decisions we make in our lives. If an outcome does not appeal to our goals and desires, we tend to perplex a way to dispute that.Finding a persons virtue may conflict with our personal goals and desires. A person may have been robbed once before, and now has a biased toward anyone that has committed a crime, disregarding of their motivation to commit the offense. If the victims personal desire is to see any person who commits theft to rot in prison, they will not consider the v irtue ethics of a prisoner, therefore, the unethical treatment of prisoners seeming completely ethical to the ethical egoist. Having served so much time in prison, deontology is the closest view to my own.I believe that every action has a consequence and people need to suffer a consequence when they have low-down the law. Respecting this theory, I still believe that everyone should be treated with respect and human decency. Although, I shot the young lady in the struggle over the gun, she was already wanted and convicted of murder. I feared for my aliveness, as well as did not intend to cause great bodily injury otherwise, I would have shot her repeatedly. Finances and social class had a lot to do with my conviction. I was unable to afford the best attorney and I was what was considered at-risk urban youth.Society did not care about the reason the victim ended up shot once. It was argued by strangers who did not know me that I deserved to serve fourteen years, and maybe even dese rved to be shot myself. both way, I am a decent human being, who wanted slide fastener other than to reintegrate into society and make a positive life for myself. People could never understand that unless they have been in prison, or have a family member who has spent time in prison. There are people who deserve to be treated fairly no consequence whether they have committed a crime or not.I am sure I can benefit from therapy. It feels as if sometimes, I am slimy from post-traumatic stress. I feel I didnt deserve to receive some of the abuse that I have fallen victim to. Inhumane treatment in prisons should be investigated. Society should take time to weigh all the issues and realize heinous crimes are committed and one absolutely should pay their debt to society, but never at the cost of their basic human rights. solely persons deprived of liberty shall be treated at all times with humanity and with respect for the inherent dignity of the human person, (OHCHR, 2005).