Steinbecks The Grapes of Wrath vs. Sinclair’s The Jungle Essay

Steinbecks The Grapes of Wrath vs. Sinclairs The jungle The global appeal of the so-called the Statesn dream of happiness and advantage has drawn many people to the promised land for hundreds of years. Although the American govern workforcet pr individuallyed equality for all on paper, it was driven primarily by money. Both Upton Sinclair and arse Steinbeck recognized this and using upd literature to convey the flaws of capitalism. Sinclairs The hobo camp satirized Americas wage slavery at the turn of the century and twoscore years later, Steinbecks novel The Grapes of Wrath criticized the commercialism of American farming. These two books, often viewed as propagandistic, employ similar persuasive strategies strong imagery, dim symbolism, biting irony, and a proposal to correct the situation. Despite these parallels, however, the authentic wording and syntax of Steinbecks writing deviates from the inconsistent style of Sinclair. After considering how each author manipu lates various stylistic elements, The Grapes of Wrath proves to be a much cogent tract.The most obvious rhetorical device in The Jungle is its powerful imagery. Sinclair offers repulsive anecdotes of work in the packinghouses. His description of the killing beds in winter vividly lingers in the mind of the reader. During winter, Sinclair says, the vicious cold of the beds caused the men to tie up their feet in newspapers and old sacks. By the end of the day, the polar blood of slaughtered cattle soaked through their improvised boots so that a man would be walking on great lumps the size of the feet of an elephant. Sinclair withal claims that when workers fell into the open vats on the floor in tank populate full of steam, their absence passed unnoticed, often over... ...beck describes them. Because the family concentrated on farming kinda of schooling, their country phrases are fitting. Steinbecks convincing portrayal of Dust ringlet migrants grabs the readers emotions , producing a compelling argument. Overall, The Grapes of Wrath proves to be a more effective novel that The Jungle. Although The Jungle shares some of the same rhetorical devices, its unrealistic dialogue and long-winded sentences detract from its potency. Steinbeck and Sinclair both successfully use imagery, symbolism, and irony to persuade their audience. In both books, various symbols emphasize the shoddy nature of the American dream, and irony mercilessly illuminates the unjust aspects of capitalism. Ultimately, however, because The Grapes of Wrath is so genuine, Steinbeck proposes a solution for crooked capitalism more successfully than Sinclair.