How Did the Rise of the State Affect the Power of the Monarch Essay

How Did the Rise of the State Affect the Power of the Monarch - Essay ExampleA spacious link existed between religion and the milkweed butterfly as messengers of God, milkweed butterflys had the divine right to regulate therefore everything they utter was the law. The monarchy was held until death or abdication and was hereditary in nature in that it was passed on to the eldest squirt of the monarch. Later elective monarchs emerged as head as those who usurped place and declared themselves monarchs like the Napoleon of France (Parker, 1999). dictatorial monarchy is whereby the monarch wields all the power he is head of government as well as the enjoin and he is the rule. Moreover, his decisions are viewed as being from God hence should not be contravened. An elective monarch is elected by an elective body for a period of time or for life such(prenominal) as the pope of Vatican City is elected by a college of cardinals. A constitutional monarch on the other hand is bound by the constitution hence he /she is just ceremonial. For example, Queen Elizabeth of England is a constitutional monarch and a head of state of several commonwealth monarchy states (Fandel, 2008). The two European countries that contributed frequently to the rise of the state are England and France. The revolutions in the two countries saw the decline in the power of the monarch and in some states its natural death. The paper will discuss how the rise of the state affected the power of the monarch. European Absolute Monarchy Most of European countries such as France, Belgium, United Kingdom, Spain and others were ruled by an infrangible monarch. According to Fandel (2008) Schiel (2005), the early monarchs arose as a result of wealth and power gained through hunting and later from agricultural activities. The wealthy people were respected and seen as closer to God than other members as they well endowed with resources. The monarchy was inherited through primogeniture whereby the eld est son ascended the throne after the monarchs demise. However, Primogeniture was criticized by some nobles more so as it discriminated against women. As a result, some states started exercising equality by allowing females to inherit the throne. The monarchs had immense power which they derived from religion. Most of Europe was under Roman Catholic Church hence kings and queens were coronated by the church. Stefoff (2008) argues that the divine right was used to justify the unlimited power of the monarch. For example in France, king Louis XIV had absolute power which he shared with trusted ministers and lived in a palace in Versailles which symbolised wealth and power (Mason, 2011). However, Beik (2005) argues that there was no absolutism due to the fact that the king collaborated with compelling elites so as to gain their support. To assert his power king Louis XV made a declaration in 1766 sovereign power resides in my person aloneits to me alone that legislative power belongs without dependency or division, all public order emanates from me. Louis XIV had also made a proclamation during his rule I am the state. (Mason 2011 p. 15). This indicates the immense power the monarchs had they were above the state. The monarch performed various roles such as making, enforcing, and rendition laws. There was no separation of power between state organs such as the legislature, decision maker and judiciary. The monarch was not