Does the new 21st century transformational form of super leader simply Essay

Does the new 21st century transformational form of super attraction simply represent the reemergence of traitbased theories of leadership - look for ExampleEventually concentrating on the three main ideas of leadership Trait theory, Situational or behavioral theory, and Transformational theory, this essay will compare and contrast these ideas in show to disc all over whether modern ideas of super-leadership is really a 21st century innovation.The first part of this essay will look at the history of leadership, and contemplate how these theories changed over time, and how they were affected by the politics of the day - whether Webers hero-based theories fall out of favor because of charismatic leaders such as Hitler and Stalin, for example. The essay will then consider the two prime theories of leadership prior to the 1970s trait theory, and situational theory. Through analysis of all of these historical theories, it is hoped that common perspectives and behaviors might be more cl early seen.Having celebrated similar themes or behaviors within the historical theories, the next part of the essay will consider transformational leadership, and its development in the twentieth century. Notions of the Super-leader will also be examined.Leadership theories do not just describe leaders of countries, or empires indeed, leadership theory in the 20th century has also focused upon billet leaders modern theorists consider teachers, football coaches, and even parents, as leaders. There are a great many books written about it also so anyone who can buy a book from a store can learn the tricks and secrets to being a great leader. Therefore, in order to understand what theorists call up when they are discussing leadership, a definition seems necessary. For the purposes of this essay, leadership is The effort to influence the behavior of individuals or members of a group in order to accomplish organizational, individual, or own(prenominal) goals (National Resources Manage ment, 1997). The main focus of most pre-twentieth century theories of leadership was the monarch, or rulers of countries. Sun-Tzus theories have already been described clearly they relate to the idea of a war-lord, or leader with military capability, not the average equipment of the business leader. Rulers were also clearly the object of Machiavellis work The Prince in his theory, rulers are made great or weak through the popular perception of them Whenever men are discussed.they are noted for various qualities which earn them either praise or condemnation (Machiavelli). In general, he believed